Understand the risks. See where controls need to improve.
Check whether policies and controls work in purchasing, payments, expenses and supplier relationships. Identify weaknesses that may enable physical and digital fraud.
Scope and deliverables defined for your business.
BARUCH / ANALYSIS AND EXECUTIONIntegrity assessment
01 / When it makes sense
Policies and controls need practical assessment, or new operations and relationships require risks and weaknesses to be understood.
Compliance, Internal Audit, Legal and Risk teams reviewing controls, third parties and sensitive processes.
In practice
Hypothetical examples of situations where this solution can help your organisation.
The same person can create a supplier record, approve the purchase and release payment. The company needs to assess risks and define appropriate checks and responsibilities for the process.
Engagements or approvals raise questions about conflicts of interest, responsibilities and controls.
A business change requires reviewing processes, dependencies and controls before setting improvement priorities.
02 / From analysis to decisions
03 / Your deliverables
Choose an option to see an example deliverable.
Swipe the options to see more deliverables →
Identified gaps in documents, workflows and controls, with records supporting the findings.
Illustrative structure. No client data or results.
| Focus | Illustrative example | Interpretation / next step |
|---|---|---|
| Expected rule | Conflicts of interest should be declared. | Illustrative document EX-01 |
| Observed gap | The workflow does not identify who receives declarations. | Check how the procedure is applied |
| Proposed control | Define an owner and a record of how matters are handled. | Validate with the responsible team |
The assessment compares expected rules with the observed workflow and records the basis for each finding.
Content and depth are defined according to your project scope.
Scenarios, impacts and vulnerabilities relevant to operations when risk assessment is included in scope.
Illustrative structure. No client data or results.
| Focus | Illustrative example | Interpretation / next step |
|---|---|---|
| Scenario | Contracting involving a potential undisclosed conflict. | Hypothetical example |
| Potential impact | A commercial decision without independent review. | Relevance assessed in context |
| Vulnerability | No step for declaring and assessing conflicts. | Control for discussion |
The matrix links the scenario to a control. Ratings should reflect operational context, without arbitrary scores.
Content and depth are defined according to your project scope.
Treatment recommendations to support process, integrity and governance owners.
Illustrative structure. No client data or results.
Assign responsibility for assessing conflicts.
Process governanceInclude the declaration and decision in the contracting workflow.
Evidence of how it was handledCheck application in the agreed sample.
Criterion: retrievable recordA priority becomes verifiable when the action, owner and expected evidence are clear.
Content and depth are defined according to your project scope.
Which decision should this deliverable support?
Tell us what you need04 / The work
Explore the stages of the work. The scope starts with your context, available information and the decision your business needs to make.
We analyse the context, critical assets, dependencies and controls related to the processes in scope.
We review documents, approvals and offline or digital workflows to identify purchasing, payment and expense discrepancies, conflicts of interest and weaknesses in third-party relationships, within the agreed scope.
We connect findings to risk scenarios and organise recommendations to inform improvements and governance decisions.
05 / A tailored scope
Combine the capabilities your challenge requires.
We assess documents, workflows and controls within the agreed scope, cross-checking available information and evidence to identify inconsistencies, implementation weaknesses and areas requiring further examination.
Deliverable: An assessment of gaps and prioritized recommendations, supported by documented findings to guide process improvements, governance decisions and referrals to the teams responsible for integrity.
We analyze the operating context, critical assets, dependencies and existing controls, combining client information and lawful sources to develop risk scenarios and assess their consequences.
Deliverable: A risk matrix covering scenarios, impacts, vulnerabilities and prioritized treatment measures, providing clear criteria for allocating resources and monitoring exposures considered relevant to the business.
Contact Baruch
Chat on WhatsApp or prepare your enquiry using the form below.
Let's talk
Add your details and a short description to prepare your enquiry by email or WhatsApp.
Connected solutions
Investigate diverted funds or goods, false documents, procurement and expense fraud, supplier collusion and online scams. We gather evidence to clarify the facts and inform decisions.
Explore the service
Connect financial flows, assets, companies and beneficiaries to give legal counsel a documented view of the case.
Explore the service
Verify individuals, companies and ownership structures at a depth suited to the decision: a hire, supplier, partner or strategic transaction.
Explore the service