Validate defences. Prioritise what to fix.
Pentest validates vulnerabilities through controlled exploitation. Red Team emulates adversary actions to assess detection and response. Both follow agreed authorisation, scope and rules of engagement.
Scope and deliverables defined for your business.
BARUCH / ANALYSIS AND EXECUTIONExecutive and technical report
01 / When it makes sense
A launch, environment change or control review calls for understanding risks, validating vulnerabilities or testing detection and response.
CISOs, AppSec, IT and security owners who need to assess systems and defensive capability.
In practice
Hypothetical examples of situations where this solution can help your organisation.
A telecom or financial services business is changing a portal that accesses customer records and transactions. An authorised Pentest validates vulnerabilities through controlled exploitation attempts and helps prioritise fixes before the next project stage.
Changed networks or environments need assessment to understand which vulnerabilities may be exploitable.
A Red Team exercise emulates adversary actions to assess how people, processes and technology detect and respond within the authorised scenario and limits.
02 / From analysis to decisions
03 / Your deliverables
Choose an option to see an example deliverable.
Swipe the options to see more deliverables →
Findings and evidence from the agreed assessment or test, with impacts and limitations.
Illustrative structure. No client data or results.
A test account accessed a record outside its permitted role during a controlled attack.
Fictional environment, authorised testAccess to information outside the intended role.
Extent validated within scopeReview the access rule and verify expected behaviour.
Test evidence referencedThe example connects the finding to its consequence and remediation. It is not a vulnerability found in a client or real system.
Content and depth are defined according to your project scope.
Vulnerabilities, attack paths or detection and response gaps, depending on the agreed approach, prioritised to inform treatment.
Illustrative structure. No client data or results.
| Focus | Illustrative example | Interpretation / next step |
|---|---|---|
| Excessive permission | Review affected roles in the authorised environment. | Priority depends on exposure |
| Preventive control | Align authorisation with the role's intended use. | Suggested owner: application team |
| Validation | Check the result within the agreed retest scope. | Criterion: unintended access blocked |
Priorities consider impact, exposure and feasibility. Retesting depends on the agreed scope.
Content and depth are defined according to your project scope.
Which decision should this deliverable support?
Tell us what you need04 / The work
Explore the stages of the work. The scope starts with your context, available information and the decision your business needs to make.
We assess objectives and risks to define assessment, Pentest or Red Team, with authorisation, rules of engagement, limits and stopping criteria.
In a Pentest, we attempt controlled exploitation to validate vulnerabilities and impact. In Red Team, we emulate adversary actions to assess detection and response. We record evidence within the agreed limits.
We explain findings and business impact. Depending on the agreed approach, we prioritise vulnerability remediation or detection and response improvements.
05 / A tailored scope
Combine the capabilities your challenge requires.
We assess threat scenarios, business impact and existing protection measures.
Deliverable: A structured risk overview with prioritised protection recommendations.
We conduct tests and controlled exploitation attempts within an expressly authorized scope. We validate vulnerabilities and impact with documented evidence, rules of engagement, operational limits and stop conditions agreed in advance.
Deliverable: A vulnerability report with technical evidence, severity ratings, business impact and remediation guidance, helping the organization prioritize and manage the treatment of identified weaknesses.
We emulate adversary actions to assess detection and response within an expressly authorized scope, with rules of engagement, operational boundaries and stop conditions agreed before the exercise begins.
Deliverable: Executive and technical reports documenting demonstrated attack paths, detection and response gaps, observed impacts and prioritized recommendations to strengthen the organization's defensive capabilities.
Contact Baruch
Chat on WhatsApp or prepare your enquiry using the form below.
Let's talk
Add your details and a short description to prepare your enquiry by email or WhatsApp.
Connected solutions
Investigate diverted funds or goods, false documents, procurement and expense fraud, supplier collusion and online scams. We gather evidence to clarify the facts and inform decisions.
Explore the service
Connect digital exposure, leaks and threats to reputation or operations through contextual analysis for the company and its leaders.
Explore the service
Support initial fact-finding and coordination among the parties involved to establish priorities during a digital incident.
Explore the service